LIKE a grand
wizard of good governance, Eberhard Bort, or ‘Paddy’ to his friends, has wise
counsel for those who seek a new and better democracy in Scotland.
Academic
and expert in all things political, he spoke to the Network from his Edinburgh
University den, deep in Chisholm House, surrounded by ceiling-high piles of
many beloved books and papers, and traced down via what seemed like a labyrinth
of paths and passageways.
Paddy
is a lecturer in politics, the Academic Co-ordinator of the Institute of
Governance and a founding member of Nordic Horizons, a group that promotes
Nordic models of governance as seriously worth considering for Scotland. You can hear his February 2012 panel-member
contribution to an event held at Holyrood called McKommunes (proposals for
Scottish municipal councils like some European ‘communes’ -- that could come
with a kilt): http://www.nordichorizons.org/mckommunes.html
He
is also co-writer of ‘The Silent Crisis’, a seminal paper published by the
Jimmy Reid Foundation in April this year. It comes with a foreword by Scottish
journalist and broadcaster Lesley Riddoch in which she refers to community
councils (CCs) as an example of why the crisis is real.
She
writes: “ . . the near zero budget for Scotland’s ‘community
tier’ of government (averaging £400 for most CCs) matches its near zero powers
and near zero number of contested elections.
This is not local democracy.”
These
are astounding claims, but Paddy says that it’s astounding in itself that so
few Scots are, first, aware of this terrible record, and second, hardly
troubled at all if they do know of it. He backs up the claims with hard facts.
Reality check
COMPARED
with other European countries of
equivalent size and population, this nation that is home to only 5m plus in
population, living in an area of diverse communities spread over huge distances
in some cases, comes right at the bottom of league tables for participatory
democracy (one councillor for every 4,000 plus citizens) and voter turnout (39%
Scotland wide). Paddy says there is ‘no
time like now’ to start radically overhauling these indicators of a democratic
system that is ‘fundamentally flawed’. (In France the ratio of councillors to
citizens is one to 400, in Iceland one in 500, in Finland one to 500 and in
Denmark, one to 2000).
“In
the UK we have completely alienated people from the governance of their
communities,” says Paddy. “And in Scotland there is something very wrong with
our democracy.
“The
public don’t know how to participate politically because it has been so long
since they have been included in significant decision making that directly
affects them. They are separated from
the process by an over-emphasis on managerial targets and a hollowing out of
democracy. We need to shift the process
back to political participation and get a better balance.
“Even
now when local authorities talk about implementing change, the focus is only on
streamlining the delivery of services.
Of course this is important, but the focus and debate needs to be much
wider than just this single issue.
“Local
government is dying, yet the case for local democracy in a global environment
is greater than ever. Democratic engagement of the people is crucial for the
nation’s future health and well-being.
We need thriving local communities that have a voice, dynamically
demonstrating civic engagement and civic pride.
“When
so much current debate is about the forthcoming referendum on Independence,
there is no time like now to bring the public alive to politics again by
offering them a chance to redefine how we do democracy in Scotland. Surely talk
about the two must go hand in hand.”
How
to do this? Does this mean a messy rebellion? No, says Paddy. It would be ‘counter-productive’ to embark on
a costly national restructuring of current local government, which is on the
whole efficient, he says. But there must
be fundamental reform to enable more citizen representation and
participation.
“Let’s
be evolutionary and incremental and build around the 32 regional councils
currently in place across Scotland,” says Paddy. “More local councils could be created by
school catchment areas, or by communities of say 5000 people. Then the
democratic process must be followed with contested elections between quality
candidates. After that it’s up to the
people in those areas how they make the important decisions based around
structure and funding.
“There
has to be a paradigm change away from mere service delivery to customers, to
participation of citizens who are willing to take responsibility for decision
making.”
Nothing else will do
THE
wise counsel concludes with a warning against substituting increasingly popular
Development Trusts as an alternative to participatory democracy. “Though Trusts may be set up by capable and
talented people who can work very hard indeed,” says Paddy, “ They can also morph
into small groups of people responsible for sizeable budgets who have not been elected
by democratic process and are not accountable to anyone except small boards
with minimal influence. They have their
place, and in some circumstances make tremendous contributions to local
communities, but they are no substitute for democracy.”
No-one
wants to see a return to the small-time politics which has in the past gone
hand in hand with small-mindedness, what some call a contrast between
‘localism’ that tends to look inwards, resisting change and protecting its own
interests, to local control, which celebrates participation as a matter of
course while retaining an open-minded dialogue and co-operation with other
regions and points of view.
There’s
only one way forward from where Paddy is standing. It follows an open road away
from the ‘control freakery’ of obsessive centralisation to a much greater
participation for all its citizens in the Scotland of tomorrow. And that’s whichever way the referendum goes. Paddy Bort calls on Alex Salmond to hold a seminar on the topic as soon as
possible.
© 2012 JENNY MACKENZIE
No comments:
Post a Comment